New research has been published which explores how to enable and encourage access to woodlands for diverse members of the public.
Access to greenspace, including woodlands, has repeatedly been found to vary. As a result, the research focused on five underrepresented groups.
These were people:
- who identify as being in poor health
- with disabilities
- from ethnic minority backgrounds
- who identify as LGBTQIA+
- on lower incomes.
Liz O’Brien, Principal Social Scientist at Forest Research explained: “There are many factors which can impact people’s access to woodlands. This could be distance, cost, woodland quality, infrastructure or facilities. Access to woodlands is also affected by other wider and more intangible factors such as awareness, sense of belonging, confidence and perceptions of risk.”

The research, which was funded by Defra’s Nature for Climate Fund, found significant differences in rates of public access between demographic groups, with travel time and mode of transport having a significant impact. It also highlighted that encouraging people to visit woodlands and fostering feelings of belonging through community engagement are important for access, because personal needs, recreational interests, and motivations may vary.
In addition, tensions were identified between the preferences of different participants. For example, between those who wish for naturalistic spaces versus more facilities and infrastructure, desire for safety versus greater privacy, and desiring targeted activities versus not feeling different to others. Other tensions related more to financial sustainability under existing funding models, for example, many people expressed a desire for continued free access and free or subsidised transport or parking while also requesting greater site spending on facilities, infrastructure and services.
Recent News
View All news
Transforming and managing stands under continuous cover forestry: silviculture guidance
A new handbook for forest managers on continuous cover forestry (CCF) is now available. Authored and published by Forest Research, the best practice guide covers information on both transforming stands to continuous cover forestry (CCF) and on managing stands using CCF approaches.
Differences persist between ex-arable and ancient woodland even after 25 years, study suggests
A rare long-term study of woodland creation found that ex-arable woodland was distinct from adjacent ancient woodland 25-years after planting
Complexity could be the key to ecosystem restoration
New research highlights the importance of ecological complexity when restoring ecosystems.
Transforming and managing stands under continuous cover forestry: silviculture guidance
A new handbook for forest managers on continuous cover forestry (CCF) is now available. Authored and published by Forest Research, the best practice guide covers information on both transforming stands to continuous cover forestry (CCF) and on managing stands using CCF approaches.
Differences persist between ex-arable and ancient woodland even after 25 years, study suggests
A rare long-term study of woodland creation found that ex-arable woodland was distinct from adjacent ancient woodland 25-years after planting
Complexity could be the key to ecosystem restoration
New research highlights the importance of ecological complexity when restoring ecosystems.