We use some essential cookies to make this website work.
We’d like to set additional cookies to understand how you use forestresearch.gov.uk, remember your settings and improve our services.
Preparing to search
Well-being, health and quality of life are holistic terms with a range of contested definitions. In general, these concepts embrace both personal and community well-being, and refer to physical, social, economic and psychological dimensions, which are connected with individual and community learning, development and capacity-building, sense of place and cultural identity. The term well-being is used here to mean all aspects of the above.
There is interest in well-being in increasingly urbanised societies, spanning a range of policy arenas from health and education through to local government drivers to create cohesive communities and attractive, liveable neighbourhoods. An expanding body of research is growing that suggests that urban greenspace can make an important contribution to well-being and be of therapeutic value, in the following ways:
Urban greenspace and green infrastructure can make a significant contribution to people’s overall well-being and quality of life, as part of their everyday experiences. The Park Life Report (Greenspace, 2007) found that 92% of survey respondents stated that they visit parks and greenspaces in the UK, and 55% visit a large park once a month. And 97% believe that parks and greenspaces help to create a nice place to live. The report states that there are approximately 29,000 parks and greenspaces in the UK. Urban greenspaces are an important wildlife resource, providing habitats for a range of flora and fauna.
However, there can also be problems with such spaces, including antisocial behaviour, rubbish-dumping and drug-taking, and these activities can lead to reduced accessibility for many people as they become fearful of accessing such spaces. A survey found that only 18% of parks were described as in good condition (Urban Parks Forum, 2001). Better understanding is needed of how urban greenspaces are used and enjoyed, and by whom, across different age ranges, ethnicity and economic status.
Neighbourhoods Green, part-funded by the Department of Communities and Local Government, is a partnership of organisations focusing on improving the greenspaces surrounding social housing. The Urban Greenspace Task Force was established in 2001, and reported in 2002 that good quality parks and greenspaces make a critical contribution to towns and cities, creating a sense of place (Urban Greenspaces Task Force, 2002).
This and other research highlights the importance of access to greenspaces for people’s overall well-being. These spaces are now supposed to be at the centre of the renaissance of towns and cities – a key aspect in regeneration projects. CABE Space was created by the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (now the Department of Communities and Local Government) to champion urban public space, particularly parks and greenspaces.
Urban greenspace is often undervalued. This is partly because of budget constraints over the past couple of decades, particularly in relation to urban parks, in which staff and maintenance have been drastically reduced. There has more recently been a move beyond valuing these spaces primarily in economic terms to gain a better understanding of the wide range and diversity of values attributed to greenspaces. In the UK, 33 million people make 2.5 billion visits to urban greenspaces each year (RCEP, 2007). There are a range of ways in which the value and contribution of urban greenspaces and the problems associated with them can be addressed. These include:
The Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution’s report on the urban environment made a number of recommendations (RCEP, 2007), including:
Peabody Hill Wood is a small woodland in Lambeth, inner London, situated between two social housing estates. The easiest way to get from one estate to the other is to walk through the woodland. In a partnership project between Peabody Trust (one of London’s oldest social housing associations), Forestry Commission, Forest Research and Trees for Cities (an environmental charity), Forest Research was asked to explore local residents’ views and use of the wood.
Qualitative focus group data, observational data and quantitative survey data were gathered across a range of residents on both housing estates. The discussion groups highlighted key problems, concerns and fears among residents about the safety of the woodland, and some of the antisocial behaviour, graffiti and rubbish dumping that takes place there. Discussions linked the management of the woodland with that of the buildings and estates. Residents felt there was declining use and abandonment of the area, and that they did not receive as much support as they had in the past in terms of maintenance.
Despite the initially negative responses from respondents, they went on to talk about how they used (or had used) the woodland and why it was important to them. A key benefit was having the space on their doorstep and being able to observe nature in the city – experience the changing seasons, listen to birdsong and admire the views (the wood is on a hill). The research outlines how people experience local woodland near to them and how they view it in relation to their everyday lives. It is clear that greenspace near to where people live is an especially important part of the quality of life and well-being for those who do not usually access the countryside.
The research outlined a number of implications for managers and policy-makers:
One of the key research themes of Forest Research’s Social and Economic Research Group is well-being and quality of life, exploring benefits of woodlands and greenspaces to people, and the governance frameworks that facilitate partnerships and participatory processes.
The Social and Economic Research Group provides advice to the Forestry Commission and forestry or greenspace sector on well-being and quality-of-life issues related to woodlands and greenspaces.
The Group can provide:
Greenspace (2007). The Park Life Report: the first ever public satisfaction survey of Britain’s parks and greenspaces (PDF-39K). Greenspace.
O’Brien, E. and Snowdon, H. (2007). Health and well-being in woodlands: a case study of the Chopwell Wood Health Project. Arboricultural Journal 30, 45–60.
O’Brien, E., Foot, K. and Doick, K. (2007). Evaluating the benefits of community greenspace creation on brownfield land. Quarterly Journal of Forestry 101, 145–151.
O’Brien, E. (2006). ‘Strengthens heart and mind’: using woodlands to improve mental and physical well-being. Unasylva 57, 56–61.
O’Brien, E. (2006). Social housing and greenspace: a case study in inner London. Forestry 79, 535–549.
O’Brien, E., Greenland, M. and Snowdon, H. (2006). Using woodlands and woodland grants to improve public health. Scottish Forestry 60, 18–24.
O’Brien, E. (2006). A question of value: what do trees and forests mean to people in Vermont? Landscape Research 31, 257–275.
RCEP (2007). The Urban Environment. Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution (PDF-6350K). Stationery Office, Norwich.
Urban Greenspaces Task Force (2002). Green Spaces: Better Places (PDF-1450K). Department for Transport, Local Government and the Regions, London.
Urban Parks Forum (2001). Public Park Assessment: a survey of local authority owned parks, focusing on parks of historic interest. Urban Parks Forum (now GreenSpace) London.
Cookies are files saved on your phone, tablet or computer when you visit a website.
We use 3 types of cookie. You can choose which cookies you're happy for us to use.
These essential cookies do things like remember your progress through a form. They always need to be on.
We use Google Analytics to measure how you use the website so we can improve it based on user needs. Google Analytics sets cookies that store anonymised information about: how you got to the site the pages you visit on forestresearch.gov.uk and how long you spend on each page what you click on while you're visiting the site
Some forestresearch.gov.uk pages may contain content from other sites, like YouTube or Flickr, which may set their own cookies. These sites are sometimes called ‘third party’ services. This tells us how many people are seeing the content and whether it’s useful.