We use some essential cookies to make this website work.
We’d like to set additional cookies to understand how you use forestresearch.gov.uk, remember your settings and improve our services.
Preparing to search
The study found impacts varied between different i-Tree Eco projects, with a number of factors identified that either hindered or supported the achievement of impact from the projects. Recommendations are made to support greater impact generation from future i-Tree Eco projects.
This represents the first known multi-project impact evaluation of i-Tree Eco. This evaluation will help to improve the impact of future i-Tree Eco surveys through better project planning, delivery and engagement with stakeholders to support understanding of the i-Tree Eco findings and implementation of the recommended actions.
i-Tree Eco projects provide information on the structure, condition and value of the urban forest (i.e. all the trees in the urban realm). Since the pilot study in Torbay in 2011, i-Tree Eco surveys have been carried out in over 20 urban areas across Wales, Scotland and England. These projects aim to provide an evidence base to inform urban tree management, raise awareness of the value of urban trees and justify investment in their management. Yet there has been little evaluation of whether such projects achieve these aims.
Forest Research has reviewed the impact of i-Tree Eco projects on awareness, policy and management associated with the urban forest in order to understand how better to utilise these surveys and their results in the future. This evaluation study was a collaboration between the Social and Economic Research Group and the Urban Forest Research Group.
Part 1. Literature review: A review of literature was conducted which explored the i-Tree Eco tool, its application internationally, the potential role for i-Tree Eco within urban forest management and the context to six case studies used in Part 2. The literature review drew on materials available online, including policies, reports, media articles and research articles.
Part 2. Impact evaluation: This part of the study focused on six i-Tree Eco projects in GB: Torbay and Sidmouth in England, Edinburgh and Glasgow in Scotland, and Bridgend and Tawe catchment in Wales. To assess impacts, 17 stakeholders were interviewed. This information was supplemented by 40 responses to an online questionnaire. Questions were designed using an impact evaluation framework that examines impact within five key impact areas. How and whether impacts were generated was explored, barriers to impact were identified and how these could be overcome was discussed.
Part 3. Impact summaries: One page reviews highlight emerging or realised impacts from eight i-Tree Eco projects (including the six case studies), with impacts identified from the interview responses and a review of reports and policies.
Part 4. Executive summary: This report brings together and summarises the results from Parts 1 and 2.
Cookies are files saved on your phone, tablet or computer when you visit a website.
We use 3 types of cookie. You can choose which cookies you're happy for us to use.
These essential cookies do things like remember your progress through a form. They always need to be on.
We use Google Analytics to measure how you use the website so we can improve it based on user needs. Google Analytics sets cookies that store anonymised information about: how you got to the site the pages you visit on forestresearch.gov.uk and how long you spend on each page what you click on while you're visiting the site
Some forestresearch.gov.uk pages may contain content from other sites, like YouTube or Flickr, which may set their own cookies. These sites are sometimes called ‘third party’ services. This tells us how many people are seeing the content and whether it’s useful.