We use some essential cookies to make this website work.
We’d like to set additional cookies to understand how you use forestresearch.gov.uk, remember your settings and improve our services.
We also use cookies set by other sites to help us deliver content from their services.
Berglind Karlsdottir, Clare Hall, Liz O’Brien, Mariella Marzano
This report reviews and summarises some of the key evidence from around the world on values associated with ash trees, and the management decisions about both ash dieback and emerald ash borer. The evidence on values focuses on historical, social and cultural values while the parts on management decisions looks at actual decisions taken as well as potential decisions, including what influences such decisions. The report concludes by highlighting areas where further evidence is needed, namely the motivations of different stakeholders to carry out actions to mitigate ash dieback and emerald ash borer, and likely acceptability of management options for emerald ash borer in the UK
Citation: Hall, C., Robinson, J., Marzano, M., O'Brien, L., Karlsdóttir, B. & Dyke, A. (2021). Values, management and pest and disease threats associated with ash: A review. Forest Research
Cookies are files saved on your phone, tablet or computer when you visit a website.
We use cookies to store information about how you use the dwi.gov.uk website, such as the pages you visit.
Find out more about cookies on forestresearch.gov.uk
We use 3 types of cookie. You can choose which cookies you're happy for us to use.
These essential cookies do things like remember your progress through a form. They always need to be on.
We use Google Analytics to measure how you use the website so we can improve it based on user needs. Google Analytics sets cookies that store anonymised information about: how you got to the site the pages you visit on forestresearch.gov.uk and how long you spend on each page what you click on while you're visiting the site
Some forestresearch.gov.uk pages may contain content from other sites, like YouTube or Flickr, which may set their own cookies. These sites are sometimes called ‘third party’ services. This tells us how many people are seeing the content and whether it’s useful.