Growth rates of common urban trees in five cities in Great Britain: A dendrochronological evaluation with an emphasis ...
Kieron Doick, Tom Levanič
Lead Author: Madalena Vaz Monteiro
We use some essential cookies to make this website work.
We’d like to set additional cookies to understand how you use forestresearch.gov.uk, remember your settings and improve our services.
We also use cookies set by other sites to help us deliver content from their services.
Preparing to search
Kieron Doick, Tom Levanič
Lead Author: Madalena Vaz Monteiro
Trees in cities provide important benefits (or ecosystem services), such as decreased local air temperatures, reduced air pollution and the attenuation of storm water. The range and volume of the benefits provided depends on the size of the trees and their canopy. While city locations can be good places for trees to grow, for example if a tree is growing alone and isolated from the competition of other trees, they can also be stressful places which present challenges to tree growth. For example a strong increase in air temperature and reduction in water availability in an urban location may restrict tree growth and in turn, the benefits it provides.
Knowledge of the rate at which trees grow in urban areas is an important consideration when calculating and valuing the benefits provided by urban trees. This paper reports on a study of growth variations in diameter and height for four common urban tree species (sycamore, silver birch, European ash and pedunculate oak) across five cities in Great Britain (Cardiff, Birmingham, Peterborough, Glasgow and Edinburgh). It also explains how climate affects the typical radial growth of ash and oak.
It explains that multiple factors affecting tree growth seem to influence different species in different ways, with for example sycamore trees showing overall the fastest growth in Peterborough but birch trees showing the slowest. Results therefore indicate a substantial variation in the mean annual growth rates across different cities. When calculating ecosystem service delivery it is therefore important to take into account the city and the age and species variations of trees within that city.
In terms of the effect of climate on the radial growth of ash and oak trees in Great Britain, rainfall and temperature where found to have an effect, but the strength and direction of influence varied with time of year, species and city. In particular, low rainfall at the start or during the growing season was found to be a significant factor limiting radial growth. A trend towards a reduction in growth was therefore identified in hot and dry years, primarily in south-eastern cities but in other cities too. This highlights the risk that a changing climate may have on the growth and, consequently, on the provision benefits by healthy urban trees. For example, if hot and dry years become the norm, the growth of both oak and ash could significantly reduce, especially in the southern regions of Great Britain.
This research was funded by the Forestry Commission and carried out in collaboration with Prof. Tom Levanic from the Slovenian Forestry Institute. It was conducted as part of Forest Research’s work quantifying the benefits of urban trees.
Cookies are files saved on your phone, tablet or computer when you visit a website.
We use cookies to store information about how you use the dwi.gov.uk website, such as the pages you visit.
Find out more about cookies on forestresearch.gov.uk
We use 3 types of cookie. You can choose which cookies you're happy for us to use.
These essential cookies do things like remember your progress through a form. They always need to be on.
We use Google Analytics to measure how you use the website so we can improve it based on user needs. Google Analytics sets cookies that store anonymised information about: how you got to the site the pages you visit on forestresearch.gov.uk and how long you spend on each page what you click on while you're visiting the site
Some forestresearch.gov.uk pages may contain content from other sites, like YouTube or Flickr, which may set their own cookies. These sites are sometimes called ‘third party’ services. This tells us how many people are seeing the content and whether it’s useful.