to Forestry Commission homepage Home > Quick links > Library > Help >
to Forest Research homepage About us > Contact us > News > Research >Products/services >Events > Search >   go

Forest Research home > Research themes > Woodlands & the environment > Climate change impacts > Phenology

Oak budburst model
 

The budburst model of Hanninen (1990) which is based on daylength (and thus latitude) and accumulated temperature has been calibrated using data from the IPG site at Headley which operated between 1967 and 1981. The model has subsequently been run for three other sites (Ashtead, Middlesex; Walsall, West Midlands; Ponteland, Northumberland) and compared with observed data provided by Tim Sparks of the Centre for Ecology and Hydrology. When the observed date of budburst at Ashtead (the most complete data-set) is compared with that predicted by the model, agreement is generally good, although for some years (eg 1972, 1973, 1979), significant discrepancies are apparent.

Graph - day of budburst vs. year

When the three additional data-sets are analysed, with model predictions based on the Headley calibration, it is apparent that at an individual site level, the agreement between modelled and observed budburst is poor in some cases. However, when data from all four sites are analysed as a single data-set, correlation is good and the data fit well with the 1:1 line; indeed, when the regression is forced through the origin (with minimal effect on correlation (r2= 0.646 vs 0.652) the slope is 1.07.

Graph - observed date of budburst vs. modelled date of budburst

The fit is poorest at Ponteland, with a lower slope indicated. This may reflect differences in climate between the closest suitable meteorological station (Cockle Park) and the site of observations (20 km apart, with Cockle Park 10 km distant from the coast, and Ponteland, 20 km). Given the potential for discrepancies in ‘observer performance’, together with differences in location of weather stations and trees, the fit is excellent, and provides a robust basis for the use of the model to predict budburst in oak across the UK for evaluations of climate change, water use, carbon exchange and pollutant uptake/exposure. The model has also been run for a number of sites in the UK to provide an indication of the geographical variation in flushing dates for two contrasting years (1986 and 1990) of observed late and early budburst at Ashtead (day 127 and 86, respectively).  

Regional variation in the flushing date of oak for an early (1990) and late (1986) year, as predicted by the oak budburst model
LocationLatitudeLongitudeAltitudeFlushing date
19861990
Penzance, Cornwall50.1-5.51911777
Nettlecombe, Somerset51.1-3.39613280
Goudhurst, Kent51.10.59013183
Alice Holt, Hampshire51.2-0.811513695
Westonbirt, Gloucestershire51.6-2.2135140102
Velindre, Powys52.0-3.215213590
Santon Downham, Norfolk52.50.72413181
Sutton Bonington, Nottinghamshire52.8-1.24813388
Aber, Gwynedd53.2-4.01812988
Harrogate, North Yorkshire54.0-1.56614098
Grizedale, Cumbria54.3-3.091139111
Clatteringshaws, Kirkcudbrightshire55.1-4.3178154122
Kielder Castle, Northumberland55.2-2.6201155122
Lochawe, Argyll56.0-5.45138122
Braemar, Aberdeenshire57.0-3.4339165133

To aid analysis of phenology, and also make the budburst model more widely available, a user-friendly ‘front-end' has now been added to the model, and will enable accessible re-parameterisation for individual species.

         


to DirectGov